The technology odyssey.

As much as we would like to think that imaging is all about skill and the artistic eye…the reality is that our art is always an interaction between our creative selves and our tools. Being human is pretty well defined as “making tools to solve problems”.

And, of course, once a tool is fashioned, it forever shapes the way we solve that particular problem.

Photography is no different. As an extension of vision, our tools (camera, darkroom, image processing software, etc.) actually shape the way we see. Add a new feature, a new technology, to our tool and our images will change…for better or worse…but change they will.

So, a little about the tools I have used in my photographic odyssey…kind of a technological odyssey.

I am tempted to take you all the way back to where I started, with a 127 roll film box camera, and follow the journey through folding 120s, black-and-white darkroom work, early 35mm consumer level SLRS, the first built in “match-needle” exposure systems, the introduction of micro-prism focusing aids, in-view-finder metering, color dark room work, auto-exposure, cibrachrome, programed exposure, interchangeable lenses, through-the-lens metering, push-processed Ektachrome, heat-seal slide mounts, and auto-focus. I was there for them all! (If you were there too, you will recognize the progression and the terms…and, from one survivor to another, congratulations! If you were not there, don’t worry. The history of any technology is completely subsumed in it’s latest manifestation…by which I mean that you are now benefiting from the lessons learned as cameras (and possibly photographers) got smarter.)

When digital came along (Trivia question: who introduced the first commercial digital still camera? Answer: Kodak, followed quickly by Apple computer! The image here is from the Wikipedia article.) I had given up carrying my multi-body, multi-lens SLR outfit because I felt that photography, primarily the hassle of carrying and caring for all that equipment, and of making continual equipment decisions in the field, was getting between me and the experience of the nature I love. I’d gone through several Point and Shoot 35mm zoom cameras in an attempt to simplify my photographic life, and had finally settled, as a compromise, on an excellent compact Olympus SLR with a built in 28-110 zoom, shooting print film. It was bigger than I really wanted, but the prints were amazingly good, and amazingly consistent, and it had a zoom range that pretty well matched my shooting style.

You have to remember that the first digital cameras cost what a full SLR outfit did, and produced images that were not quite as good as those from a $25 instamatic pocket camera loaded with Fujicolor and processed at the local drug store.

Still, the attraction of digital was immediate and obvious, and I will admit to waiting somewhat impatiently for the technology to improve and the cost to come down.

2.1 mp OlympusWhen the first 2.1 mp cameras broke the $500 price barrier, that was it for me. $500 was what I was spending on film and processing in a year. I bought an Olympus C2020, with a 1-3 zoom. I have not bought a roll of film since.

Right from the start, digital imaging hooked me. There is a quality to a digital image, especially when viewed on the LCD of a computer, that is more slide-film-like than print-film-like. The images are luminous, and even that 2.1 mp sensor captured the quality of light in a way that simply delighted me. Then too, that was just about when Photoshop Elements made its bow…and for a minor investment you could have more control over the image than any dark-room magician could have ever imagined. The digital file captured by the camera is roughly equivalent to the “first draft” of the image. You need a good first draft, but a little polishing in software often produces a much more elegant final image than you have any right to hope for.

Since my first digital I have owned and used a 4.1 mp Olympus, a 5 mp Minolta (with 28-210 equivalent zoom), a 5 mp Sony, a 8 mp Sony, and a 6 mp Sony (for the 32mm equivalent wide-angle and its shirt-pocket size).

I took thousands of very satisfying nature, creative, and landscape image with these P&S digitals. At first it was a compromise…I knew I was trading some image quality for ease of use (and that particular digital “vive” mentioned above), but it was a trade-off that I was willing to make.

(The major improvement I have seen, by the way, as the mp’s climbed, is not in detail but in color accuracy. My first images with the 2.1 mp sensor now look almost cartoonish when compared to the images from today’s sensors and internal processing software. )

I’ve already mentioned my personal epiphany, while reviewing and processing images of the Grand Canyon taken with a pocket-sized Sony 6 mp digital camera, and comparing them in memory to shots taken with my full 35mm SLR rig and slide film in the same locations. The digital images were better. The color was truer and more vivid. The exposures were amazingly accurate over an impossible range of lighting conditions. The tiny Carl Zeiss lens caught both the details and the grandeur of the Canyon in a completely satisfying way.

Today’s camera is a Sony DSC H9. It is lightweight and compact enough to carry everywhere, has a 31 mm to 465 mm equivalent zoom to cover an amazingly wide range of imaging options, adequate image quality, excellent color rendition, an articulated LCD that opens up all kinds of new angle opportunities, and a macro mode that focuses down to 2 cm for incredibly detailed close-ups.

It is the most “fun” camera I have ever owned…and I’ve taken almost as many images with it in a year as I did with all my other digitals put together.

In fact, I am ready to say that it (and its superzoom counterparts from other makers) represent, for me, pretty close to the ideal tool for nature, creative, and landscape imaging.

In the past year I have also invested in Adobe Lightroom, with its, for me, totally intuitive set of editing tools.

And finally, I discovered flickr…which is a wonderful platform (one of several out there) for sharing images with other’s of like interest.

Of course, someone, right this moment, somewhere is working on refining the tools we use…building an even better camera, better image editing software, and better image sharing services. New tools. New opportunities. New ways of seeing and recording the things around us which resonate with our souls.

The odyssey is not over. This is a good thing!

7 Responses to The technology odyssey.

  1. WONDERFUL start!!! I’ve been into photography since I was about 8 or 10 ~ so long ago, I can’t remember. I’ve always loved taking pictures. My father and brother had a dark room in our basement and I guess that’s where I got the bug. However, I didn’t always get the pictures printed for various reasons so when digital came along, I was sold! Got my first one, a Kodak Z740 P&S and have taken over 10,000 pictures in a year and a half. I’m SOLD!!!!!

  2. I have been in this hobby (photography) for about 8 months. I am a computer programmer by trade. My hobbies before photography were computers, and high fidelity. I am 40 years old. I bought my first digital camera about 7 years ago, the Kodak DC5000 paid ~$600 for a 2meg, weatherproof camera to use with my main hobby computers. I was happy with it, but the picture quality never excited me enough to get into the hobby of photography, I figured to get the type of pictures you see in magazines you have to spend over $1500 and devote yourself to a long learning process. My second camera just to replace my aging DC5000 ended up being the Kodak Z612. I was “blown away” or extremely pleased by the quality of the pictures and what the image stabilized 12X zoom could do. And their was no learning process, just point and shoot. I got involved more into the hobby because of my excitement of the images I was producing. I now own the very nice wide angle Kodak P880.

    So I fully understand the phrase “because it work!” because it does work. I do not know, or maybe nobody knows the line between pictures that are just nice pictures, and pictures that are “beautiful”. However I always thought to get to that “beautiful” picture quality you needed to buy an expensive dSLR/SLR ; no more, today a $200 camera buys you those “beautiful” pictures. These cameras are creating a whole new generation of photographers. Digital cameras that produce “beautiful” pictures are exploding with fans like the ones on this new Blog.

  3. Thanks for this. I felt very indulgent and a bit guilty when I bought my Canon S5 1S a few months back, but I am just having so much fun with it. I would also like to improve the editing, I’ve just got the PhotoImpressions that came with the computer. I felt guilty about that as well when I started – like cheating! It was like trying to improve on God’s creation – but I feel better now when I feel I’m just improving on the camera!!

  4. Thanks for the comments! Let me know what we can do here that will be of interest. In particular Judy, I plan some articles on using Lightroom (which gives us jpg shooters many of the same tools raw shooters have been using) and Photoshop Elements. Maybe that will inspire your editing efforts.

  5. As a newcomer to landscape and nature photograph; four months, but an avid enthusist taking more than five pictures daily I am looking forward to this blog. I own three digital cameras: two Kodaks and one Samsung. My latest the Z712 IS. I am just getting aquainted with and do not know its capabilities yet. I am sure I’ll grow into with time and practice.

  6. Pingback: Let (within reason) the camera do the work! « Steve Ingraham’s Point and Shoot Landscape

  7. A remarcable amount of information regarding P/S cameras. I have a Nikon FS, 82Ed on a tripod with a P5100 handheld. I’m waiting
    paitently for my adapter to get here.
    I’m having trouble getting a sharp focus, at what I call long range birds (200 meters+) My scope is showing a beautiful image, that can’t be improved on. But, handheld, and without a cable release, I don’t think it can be done with any consistancy.

    Do you think this will improve the sharpness of the focus, and eliminate some of the handheld problems?

    Your site is the best of any I have been to. You are a talented instructor, and have expert knowledge of the topics. I saw some of your replys on the YahooDidiscoping site. Please keep up your site, and I will send some birds when I improve. Piney

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>