Steve Ingraham’s Point and Shoot Landscape

Shooting Snow!

January 10, 2010 · 4 Comments

Among the hardest scenes for the landscape photographer to capture, snow has to rank right up there at the top. In sunlight, a snow covered landscape exceeds the light sensitivity range of our eyes…let alone a digital camera sensor. Even in lower light levels, under overcast skies or while it is actually snowing, it is very difficult to balance exposure in camera to produce white snow with significant texture and detail, and true to life colors where color is showing. If the snow is right, everything else in the scene is dark gray to black…which is one reason so may photographers resort to black and white when shooting snow scenes.

Over the New Year’s holiday we got significant amounts of fresh snow here in southern Maine, so, of course, I was out with my camera. That first day I was out while it was actually snowing. Light levels were subdued,the sky was a dark grey blur,  and there was a lot of snow still in the air, closing horizons like fog. I was out a few hours and had a chance to reflect on the process of capturing a snowy landscape.

In subdued light, without any direct sun, I find that my camera responds best if I simply leave it on Programmed Auto. This produces a balanced exposure with enough detail in the snow so that I can bring it down and out in Lightroom, and enough color in whatever is still showing color so that I can bring it up and out.

Here is a shot, just as it came from the camera (just resized for display here).

blizzard00001

As you can see, the snow is kind of gray, and there is little to no color in the beach grasses.

A trip through Lightroom results in this image.

I applied Recovery to bring out what little detail is in the snow and sky, then Fill Light for the color. The Blackpoint is shifted right, and I added Clarity (local contrast) and Vibrance (selective saturation) and finally used the Sharpen Landscape preset. I increased Contrast overall just slightly.

This image is very close to my visual impression of the scene when taken.

Here is another, somewhat classic shot.

blizzard00002

In camera exposure is not very spectacular…but the information is all there for post-processing.

Using almost exactly the same processing in Lightroom as the first image I was able to preserve the snow detail while bringing out the color in the evergreens.

One more from the subdued light series.

blizzard00004

The differences here are more subtle but there is an increase in both snow detail and color.

The key here is that I am working with a balanced exposure, as provided by the auto exposure system in the camera, with no manipulation, then doing all my adjustments in post-processing. Of course this is only possible if you know both how your camera is going to respond to these kinds of scenes and what you are able to do in software afterwards. Both in camera exposure and post-processing are part of the creative process, and part of the envisioning of the image when it is being taken.

I can’t emphasize that enough. What you are going to be able to do in post has to be part of your exposure decision in camera.

Of course, eventually the sun does come out. It might be days later, as it was in Maine, but the sun completely transforms the exposure issue for snow covered landscape.

Most people require sunglasses to deal with sun on snow. I use a wide brimmed hat. Whatever it takes, even our unprotected eyes can be overwhelmed by the glare of light when the sun shines on snow.

If your eyes can’t handle it, there is absolutely no chance the digital sensor in our cameras can. With sun on show you really have no good choices. Either you expose for the sky and any color in the scene, and the snow goes completely white and featureless, or you expose for the snow, and everything else goes black. Even if you expose for the snow, you run the risk of getting grey snow with very few highlights, and that does not look real either. No good choices.

The usual way of dealing with snow and sun is to use Exposure Compensation. Most digital cameras, when placed in Programmed Auto mode, will allow you to shift the EV (Exposure Value) up or down by 2 points. Each 1 EV change is equivalent to doubling or halving the exposure. Some cameras have a dedicated button for this, or an easy to find menu option. Some have it buried in the menu system…though it is generally fairly near the top since it is often used.

Conventional exposure wisdom says that for sunny snow covered landscape or sun on snow details you should reduce the exposure by –.7 to –1 EV. Here are two examples of the difference that makes. Standard Programmed auto shot first then –.7EV.

Image00001

Image00002

As you see, standard Programmed Auto produces large areas of snow that is totally burned out…so white there is no detail left. It does, however, keep the dark areas in the scene reasonably exposed. Dialing down the EV to –.7 keeps more detail in the sunniest areas of snow, but casts everything else, including shadows on the snow, way too dark.

That’s okay though…we are not looking at these as finished exposures, but as starting points for post processing. The question is, with proper processing which will capture more of the detail of the natural scene?

DSC08636

This the first programmed auto image processed in Lightroom. I used heavy Recovery for the snow highlights, a touch of Fill Light for the shadows, blackpoint just to the right, added Clarity and Vibrance and Sharpen Landscape preset.

Here is the –.7 EV image processed.

Much less Recovery, though still some. Much more Fill Light for the shadows, and consequently blackpoint further right. Added Clarity and Vibrance and Sharpen Landscapes. Because the shadows are darker the blue cast common in sun on snow shots was much more pronounced in this image, so I used the selective saturation tool to desaturate just the blue of the shadows.

Which is closer to a naked eye view? Which is a better image? I prefer the second shot which started with –.7EV.

On the other hand, there is the theory that conentional auto exposure of sun on show sets the exposure too low…for the snow…and everything else goes dark while the snow looses it whiteness. This is especially true in shots of people against snow backgrounds in full sun. Here are two shots, one at 0EV and one at +.7EV

.Image00008

Image00009

As you see, the snow is white in the +EV shot and the trees look more natural. However, with processing in Lightroom, the 0EV shot (darker) still yielded the more satisfying image.

Here is an extreme.

I shot this close up of an area of intense sun on snow at –.7EV.

Image00003

Way too dark.

Processing in Lightroom, plus a little cropping, (with a good deal of desaturation of the blue shadows) gives us this.

In general I had more success processing –.7EV shots on this sunny day than I did with standard Programmed auto shots. I did not like the +EV shots.

So, what do you do if your camera does not have EV Exposure Compensation settings? Some don’t. Most do however have Scene Mode…and one of the Modes included is almost certainly Snow or Sand & Snow.

However, these Modes are based on the assumption that you are taking images of people against a snowy backdrop…they increase exposure, generally by .5 to 1EV. And that is good. For people shots or if your primary interest is objects in the foreground. For Snowy Landscapes, however, it might just be counterproductive…especially if you consider the in-camera exposure as only a starting point for post-processing. If, on the other hand, you are not going to post-process, the Snow Mode may indeed give you more satisfactory snow scenes.

Take these two shots right from the camera. The first is conventional Programmed auto and the second is Snow Mode.

Snow00006

Snow00005The second shot looks a bit more natural to me.

Again.

Snow00003 

and

Snow00004

If I were processing these…the first in each case would make the better image, given the tools I have in Lightroom. If using them direct from the camera, however, there is no doubt that the Snow Mode does its job and produces a better snow image.

So. Let it snow. Let it show. Shoot the snow.

Just know what your camera is capable of, and what you are able to do in whatever post processing program you prefer. Expose in camera for best post.

Let it snow. Shoot snowy landscapes!

→ 4 CommentsCategories: Lightroom · aesthetics · editing · instruction · postprocessing · snowy landscape

A Year of Pics and Places

December 31, 2009 · 3 Comments

Happy New Year!

A journey through my past year via the pictures and the places. What a blessing it has been, beginning to end! I can only praise my God, for God is God and God is good.

Each thumbnail is linked back to the gallery it came from on WideEyedInWonder.  This is not a best of, by any means. Just a key to the places and the pics. To remember. To celebrate. To enjoy.

Jan

Parson's Beach, Kennebunk ME, New Year's Day Sunset 2007

Kennebunk ME

Ding Darling National Wildlife Refuge, Sanibel Island, FL 2009

Sanibel Island FL

Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge, Black Point Drive, Titusville FL 1/2009

Merritt Island FL

Feb

Sonoma CA

DSC05303
Albuquerque NM

Snowy Day February, Parson's Beach, Kennebunk ME
Kennebunk ME

March

San Diego, CA 2009 Sunset Cliffs and Cabrillo NM.
San Diego CA

L S de Elcano, Spanish Royal Navy training ship. 3rd largest Tall Ship.
Galveston TX

Parson's Beach, Kennebunk, ME 3/2009
Kennebunk ME

April

Alligator Farm, St. Augustine FL
St. Augustine FL

St. Augustine FL
St. Augustine FL

Rachel Carson NWR, Wells ME 4/2009

Wells ME

May

Enduring the Rain: Central Park, The Boathouse and the Ramble, NYC
NYC

Saco Heath, Saco ME 5/2009
Saco Heath ME

Parson's Beach, Kennebunk ME 5/2009

Kennebunk ME

June

Chase Lake NWR, ND 6/2009
Jamestown ND

Mount Desert Island, ME, 6/2009
Acadia NP ME

Fernald Brook, Kennebunk, ME 6/2009
Kennebunk ME

July


Kennebunkport ME

Coastal Maine Botanical Gardens, Boothbay Harbor, ME 7/2009
Coastal ME Botanical Gardens

Coastal Maine Botanical Gardens, Boothbay Harbor, ME 7/2009
Costal ME Botanical Gardens

Aug

DSC07603
Rutland Water UK

Rachel Carson NWR, Wells, ME 8/2009
Rachel Carson NWR ME

Kennebunk ME, Rose
Kennebunk ME

Sept

Portland Head Light, September 2009
Portland Head Light ME

Lakeside OH, 2009
Lakeside OH

DSC07848
Point Lobos CA

Oct

DSC07902
Kennebunk ME

DSC07922
Jekyll Island GA

Z1000067
Green Kay FL

Nov

DSC07977
Cape May NJ

DSC08095
Kennebunk ME

 DSC08213
Wetzlar Germany

Dec

DSC08293

Kennebunk ME

Desert Botanical Gardens, Phoenix AZ, 12/09
Phoenix AZ

DSC08340
Kennebunkport ME

May your New Year be blessed, with places and images you will always remember.

→ 3 CommentsCategories: 2009 · inspiration · retrospective

Your Zoom is for Framing!

December 28, 2009 · Leave a Comment

This is another in the series of pieces that began with The Photogenic Moment, and continued with It’s all about Patterns.

The vast majority of digital cameras sold today are sold with a zoom lens. Your average entry level Point and Shoot will have a 3x zoom. 4 and 5x zooms are becoming the norm for anything above entry level. The top of the line P&Ss come with 15-20x zooms today: the equivalent of a true wide angle to a fairly long telephoto lens on an old fashioned 35mm film camera (witch still sets the standard by which we judge relative focal lengths and fields of view) or a full frame DSLR: that is equivalent to a 28mm to over 500mm lens. Even entry level DSLRs come with a kit lens that is generally a moderate wide to moderate tel zoom (35mm-105mm).

Most beginning photographers (and many advanced ones, if truth were told) think of the zoom as means of fitting in more of the room or more faces inside, or taking in the majestic sweep of a landscape outside, at the wide end, and then being able to zoom up to high power to bring distant things close, outside, or to fill the frame with a single face out of the crowd inside. They think close or far: zoom out, zoom in.

And, once more, if truth were told, most photographers use their zooms either at the full wide end, or the full telephoto, wishing for more at either end…and rarely anywhere in between.

In reality though, as you grow as a photographer, you will realize that the main function of the zoom on your camera is simply to control the size of the frame you are filling with image. A big frame, as in a group shot or wide landscape, is at the wide angle end of the zoom. A small frame, as in a portrait or a more intimate landscape, if found at the telephoto end of the zoom. And there are an infinite range of frame sizes in between, each appropriate for some image.

You could grow a lot as a photographer by making a commitment to yourself to use the full range of your zoom…to take images at every possible setting.

Here is a classic case. All examples here are from the Sony DSC H50 with a 15x zoom: 31mm to 465mm equivalent.

A wide angle shot (31mm equivalent), cropped from the bottom to look even wider, and…

A telephoto shot taken at the about 70mm equivalent from the same position. I did not use the zoom to bring the trees closer. I used it to adjust the size of the frame within which the trees appear.

Or another pair from the same day.

Framed at about 70mm equivalent.

Framed at about 250mm equivalent from the same spot, and cropped from the bottom and top to make it look wider.

Or take this pair:

At full wide (31mm equivalent) and then…

this, taken at about 300mm equivalent from the same spot…framing just a segment of the foam in the shot above.

Of course, this is not a question of right or wrong…good zoom or bad zoom. I am consciously using the zoom on the camera to adjust the size of my frame. What I fill it with, once it is adjusted, is another matter (see It is all about patterns… ).

In this shot, I used the camera zoom, at about 250mm equivalent, to isolate (frame) just a portion of the cactus…the part I was interested in. I could have accomplished the same thing by moving closer to the cactus, of course, but, hay, that’s what the zoom is for!

Here is a sequence of three shots, all taken from the same spot, with different zoom settings, for dramatically different effects.

By using the zoom to alter the size of the frame, I am able to create everything from landscape to abstract, without moving a step.

For the following shot I wanted to emphasize the Rhodora at the foot of the trees. Zooming in to 180mm equivalent allowed me to frame shot so that there is a balance between the flowering shrubs and the trees.

Or, again, two shots from the same position with very different zoom settings: full telephoto at 465mm equivalent, and full wide at 31mm equivalent.

Chances are very good you have zoom on your P&S camera. Think of it as a framing tool…the means by which you control the size of the frame you fill with your image…then use it…use every setting. Experiment with all the different size frames you might apply on any scene, from any single location.

Your images will be the better for it.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized

It is all about patterns…

December 24, 2009 · 2 Comments

One of the points I made in a recent post about the Photogenic Moment (they are all photogenic moments) is that photography is really all about patterns:

“Look for patterns…look for patterns to fill the frame of the image. Big patterns, as in a landscape, and little patterns, as in a macro. It is all about patterns. Line and form and light…the way shapes are arranged to fill frame the camera is able to capture, just a little rectangle after all, and the way the light molds the shapes with highlight and shadow. The way the colors, which are the second aspect of light, fall within the frame. You are not photographing things or people. You are capturing patterns within a frame. The things (or people) that make the patterns may be more or less important, but their importance is controlled by where you place them in the pattern you have captured (composition…rule of thirds, point-of-view, etc. See The Really Strong Suggestion of Thirds, Point of View, Shopping for Color in Old Town Albuquerque, and Lupine Lesson: Point of View). It is the pattern that will make or break the photograph. It is the pattern that the photograph is really about.”

In my next few posts, beginning here, I will explore this subject in more detail.

There are, of course, images which are simply about pattern…no apologies needed, and no explanations. Pure pattern.

Take this shot from a recent trip to the Desert Botanical Gardens in Phoenix Arizona.

It is a picture of cacti, part of a display of native species, but it is clearly not about cacti…it is about the shapes, the forms, the curves and swirls that the growing cactus has made…and what the flat open shade light of the moment was making of them. It might even be about the contrast between the intricate covering of sharp thorns and the gentle forms underneath. I can see this at about 3×2 feet on a wall behind a couch. It is, imho, an image that you could look at every day and enjoy every time you looked…because there is simply a whole lot going on in an apparently simple image.

Or here is another cactus shot from the same day.

This one is about the light and molding as much as the shapes and patterns, and there is, honestly, a lot less going on…but it is, as I see it, still a strong image: strong graphically with a powerful central focus which is not apparent on first glance. Study it a moment and see what it does to your eyes. Where do your eyes go, and where do they come to rest?

If we pull back and look at a landscape/architectural shot from Cape May, New Jersey…the famous Cape May Light, we can see how a more detailed analysis plays out.

Here is the shot:

Taking it into PhotoShop Elements and using Poster Edges brings out the basic shapes.

DSC07977-post

Making it black and white makes it even more obvious:

DSC07977bw

And, we can even draw the basic patterns to make it really obvious.

Picture1

The image is composed, on this basic level, of three intersecting shapes against a background or field…and is a very simple shot.

While composing the shot (I took several from this vantage point), I was actually, after the first “for the record” shot, very aware of these three shapes against the field, and composed and recomposed, shifting point of view slightly, zoom in and out for framing, until I got them where I wanted them: filling the frame with this pattern.

It is not really a lighthouse picture…or rather it is, at least I hope it is, just a bit more: satisfying as both portrait of lighthouse and as graphical design.

If we go the other way, and apply an Oil Painting effect in Paint.net to blur out detail and emphasize color, we see a different, somewhat contrasting, pattern.

LighhouseColor

Reducing it to its most basic tonalities by painting rough shapes over, we really have only six basic blocks and five tones. It has to work on this most basic level as design as much as at the shape level.

LHBColor

And of course, back at the top detail level, it is as much about the contrast in texture between the feathery phragmities  in the foreground, the intricate foliage in the mid-ground, and the solid stone shape of the lighthouse in the background as it is about anything else.

Lots going on here.

Once more, I did not actually think all this through in the field…but I was aware of it. I sensed it. I saw it. I worked the view until it all came together into an image I wanted to take with me…until the patterns satisfied.

Here is another shot from the Desert Botanical Gardens, this time of glass sculptures.

This one is pretty obvious and works on three levels. Basic shapes:

Picture2

Color:

YucaColor

And the top level detail.

Desert Botanical Gardens, Phoenix AZ, 12/09

All combining to a pleasing image:

But what about images where it is really about the subject?

Take this image of two Giraffes nuzzling from the Alburquerque Zoo.

 

Pretty basic. But I took quite a few shots of these two. This is the one I kept because of it’s patterns…because of its graphical design elements :

Albuquerque New Mexico 2/2009

Maybe even easier to see here:

GfColor

Another sweeping landscape: from the top of Cadillac Mountain in Acadia National Park on a perfect sky day.

Look at the basic shapes to see why this shot, of the 100 or more I took from the top of the mountain that afternoon, made it into my portfolio.

Picture3

And the basic color tone pattern.

CloudsColor

Any photograph has to work as pattern first, before it will work in any way.

Portrait of a bird, a Cactus Wren, again from the Desert Botanical Gardens: look at the basic patterns underlying the detail.

It is least obvious, but perhaps most important, in pictures of people. It is the underlying patterns that set the really satisfying images apart from the rest, at least in my opinion.

This shot of three attractive young ladies (my daughters so I can stay that) is, in reality, all about the basic patterns and the way they fill the frame. In your mind’s eye, break it down into the kind of basic shape drawing I have used above. The girls are more than ornament, of course, but it is the underlying shapes that draw the eye to where it can appreciate the beauty of the girls, and the tone patterns that hold the eye there. IMHO.

GirlsColor

Once more…same three girls, and again, in a very carefully composed shot.

Carefully composed does not mean staged. It was a matter of seconds to reposition myself and use the camera zoom for framing to get this relatively spontaneous portrait…but that does not mean that in those few seconds I was not fully aware of the compositional elements…of the play of shape and form and placement within the frame that makes it all hang together, at least for me. Draw the shapes out and see how it looks and you will see (hopefully) exactly why the girls are where they are, and the lighthouse is where it is.

You will not develop this sense of pattern…graphical design…overnight, but if you persist in your efforts at photography, and if you look carefully at the images that satisfy you most, you will begin to be sensitive to…more or less consciously aware of…the basic patterns that fill the frame. You will begin to work with them. And your images, imho, will be the better for it.

→ 2 CommentsCategories: Uncategorized

The Photogenic Moment?

December 23, 2009 · 3 Comments

North American Butterfly Gardens, Mission TX

My first Pic of the Day post

Just over a year ago I started a Pic of the Day project, sort of by accident. I was new on Twitter and Facebook at that time, and I began to post, just for fun, an image each day to TwitPics and to FaceBook. After a few days of that it occurred to me that it might be fun to make it a project, and I formalized my posting. My rules were simple: 1) any image I wanted to share, no matter when or where taken, and 2) one image per day, without missing a day.

That went on for about a month, but then it occurred to me (these things do occur if you let them) that people might like to know where and when the image was taken, how and why. For that matter, I wanted to know those things myself…when and where were matters of record (when is in the exif data, and memory generally serves for where), but the how and why mattered more to me, and I suspected would be more valuable to others…and they were much harder to pin down.

In order to share that information, I needed more space than TwitPics and Facebook allowed me, so it seemed natural to start another WordPress blog, and I did. Steve Ingraham’s Pic of the Day.

I knew from my experience here at Point and Shoot Landscape that the major beneficiary of the new blog would be me. Articulating what I have here about how I take pictures has been invaluable in helping me to refine my methods in the field…and recounting that daily, one image at a time, could only force me to learn a lot faster. I posted a brief repose on the anniversary of the Pic of the Day blog outlining some of that learning, and I will not repeat that here…but over the past few weeks I have noticed another change in my way of working which is significant and worth talking about here.

I don’t actually like to have to dip back into my archives to fill a day. I have thousands of images already posted to Flickr and Smugmug…certainly enough for several years of Pic of the Day blogs, but I don’t like to use them unless there is a particular reason. It always feels like cheating to me to go back to work I did several years ago…and certainly less interesting. I doubt, in fact that it matters to my readers, but it does to me. Occasionally, as when I was traveling in England this summer, it makes sense to me to revisit a past trip and post some of that work, as a kind of introduction the new work I hope to produce on this trip…to get both the reader and myself in the right mind-set for images of England.  That’s okay. But just dipping back because I don’t have any new work to share…well, that makes me feel just a bit guilty.

It has served as a spur, more than once this past year, to get out and take some pictures already! I am not really comfortable unless I have a week’s worth of Pic of the Days in the can…processed in Lightroom, uploaded to WideEyed InWonder  (my Smugmug site), and ready to be posted to Pic of the Day. And because of that, I have become a much more concentrated shooter on the days when I am out…and, I go out much more often with the express intent of filling my Pic of the Day stock.

Photography is not my job. I work full time, have a family to care for, other blogs to produce (Cloudy Days and Netbook Nights on cloud computing, netbook tech, and iPhone applications takes a considerable amount of my time), etc. My photography time is limited. Often only the fact that my PotD stock is running low forces me to make time for photography! It has inspired me to make time on business trips, even if it is only a few hours snatched between other obligations, and, perhaps more importantly, to shut down the computer and get outside…somewhere…anywhere…around home to find images to fill my PotD stock.

First Snow Morning

It forced me, after the first snow of the year, to find my boots and get out at sun-up. It forced me to don my winter coat and gloves and drive the miles on a frosty Saturday morning to Emmon’s Preserve the other day…just to see if there was anything there worth photographing that day.

During the Lunch break at Cloister in the Wood, Germany

It forced me, on a trip to Germany, to get outside on lunch breaks between meetings, camera in hand. It forced me to take my few rest hours in Germany between sets of meetings (I had half of a day on Sunday uncommitted) to walk the old town of Wetzlar and look for images…when I would, in many ways, much rather have been resting at my hotel. It has forced me, on Sunday mornings in Texas, when exhausted from a week of field-trips and talking to birders (my job), to leave my binos at the hotel and go look for images.

Sunday morning in Old Town Wetzlar, Germany

And, on each outing, if forces me to be productive. It forces my eyes wide open, and my imaging sense into high gear every moment I am in the field. I am looking for images. I need to bring back the bacon every chance I get, and since that Pic of the Day just does not stop, I have to bring back as many good images as I possibly can. WideEyedInWonder is apt. Only now I can’t wait for the wonder to happen to me…I have to go out looking for wonder!

And what a difference that makes. From looking for photogenic moments, I have had to turn to making every available moment photogenic. It is a matter of focus and will…of turning the skills I have developed over a lifetime in photography loose in a hyper-intentional way every moment I have. As I write this, I am realizing that, while focus and will are accurate, so is the loose in that sentence. It requires a kind of relaxing…a certain restful confidence that the images are there, that I will find them…and that my skills, always growing, will rise to the occasion of capturing any and all images that offer, when I am consciously looking for them.

“You don’t take a photograph…you make a photograph.” Ansel Adams.

Over the past year I have really learned that lesson…I need to make images for Pic of the Day…and on outing after outing…I go out and do make images.

Winter morning at Emmons Preserve, 10 miles from home

Whether it is a winter morning at Emmon’s Preserve with nothing much out of the ordinary happening, or a winter morning at the Desert Botanical Garden in Phoenix, one of the most photogenic places I know of…there are images to be found…photogenic moments to be captured. I might come back from Emmons with 10 good images (10 Pic of the Day posts!) and I might come back from the DBG with 30, but I do come back from every outing with images worth sharing. And that is a very good feeling.

Winter morning at the Desert Botanical Gardens, Phoenix AZ

Okay, so good enough for me…but what do I have to say that might help you to achieve something similar?

1) set yourself a goal. If an image a day seems too steep, try for an image a week (much less than that seems, to me at least, to be too tenuous to hold on to). Just the process of looking closely at a single image you have made every day or every week will quickly make you better at seeing images wherever you look. And, if like me, it inspires you to take (make) more images, that is all to the good!

2) relax. Begin where you are. If your camera is still on Auto, shoot on auto. If you look at my blog you will see that 90% of my images are taken on Programmed auto…without any in-camera adjustments on my part (one of the lessons I have learned from the Pic of the Day blog, by the way…I had no idea how mundane my shooting habits are until I had to write it down every day). The Programmed there might mean that adjustments are possible…it does not mean that I often make them.

3) Look for patterns…look for patterns to fill the frame of the image. Big patterns, as in a landscape, and little patterns, as in a macro. It is all about patterns. Line and form and light…the way shapes are arranged to fill frame the camera is able to capture, just a little rectangle after all, and the way the light molds the shapes with highlight and shadow. The way the colors, which are the second aspect of light, fall within the frame. You are not photographing things or people. You are capturing patterns within a frame. The things (or people) that make the patterns may be more or less important, but their importance is controlled by where you place them in the pattern you have captured (composition…rule of thirds, point-of-view, etc. See The Really Strong Suggestion of Thirds, Point of View, Shopping for Color in Old Town Albuquerque, and Lupine Lesson: Point of View). It is the pattern that will make or break the photograph. It is the pattern that the photograph is really about. (I plan a blog entry about this pattern thing soon.)

4) don’t wait for the Photogenic moments…go out and find them…better yet, go out and make them. Pattern: line and form, light and shadow and color…pattern is everywhere. There are no unphotogenic moments. Photogenic is not, when it comes right down to it, an attribute of the world you are part of (though we generally use it that way)…it is, in reality, an attribute of your soul, your mind, your spirit…of the person you are in the world. You make the photograph. It is your eyes that find the patterns. Your hands that hold and point the camera. Your finger that fires the shutter. It is all you…all in you…trust your photogenic soul, feed your photogenic soul, fill your photogenic soul. Go wide-eyed in wonder and the whole world is full of wonder! If I did not know that before, I certainly have learned it through the Pic of the Day blog…and learned to trust it implicitly.

So, here’s a deal for you. If any of you are inspired to start a Pic of the Day, or Pic of the Week blog, I promise to visit every day/week and look at your work. Promise. And I will make, as often as possible, comments. How’s that for a deal? But you have to be faithful. A Pic of the Day blog means every day…never fail. Pic of the Week, ditto.

Photogenic moments? I am eager to see what moments you make.

Bend in the stream of time: photogenic moments around every bend...

→ 3 CommentsCategories: Opinion · aesthetics · inspiration · instruction

Netbooks for Traveling Photographers: Take Two

December 8, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Over on Cloudy Days and Netbook Nights: Netbooks, take two.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Reviews · editing · postprocessing

Distortion City! (and how to cure it…)

December 3, 2009 · 6 Comments

One of the most difficult subjects for today’s Point and Shoots, even the most advanced (maybe especially the most advanced with their superzooms) is architecture. This was brought home to me after a recent visit to Germany where I was pretty much confined to photographing the Old Town in Wetzlar (and a cloister/hotel in Lich). Very picturesque…but, with its exposed beamwork, tall thin buildings, narrow streets, and stone walls it is subject matter which brings out absolutely the worst in todays’ modern zooms. Curves replace straight lines everywhere. Buildings lean into the frame at crazy angles. Walls waver and bulge. Shooting from street level on narrow cobblestone streets the perspective distortion alone is dramatic…when you add the distortions of a P&S zoom, things get more than a little crazy.

Example.

Crazy Distortion!

I really like these buildings, this street, and I can live with the distortions of the lens I was working with. It is still a satisfying image, in my opinion, despite the really severe distortions displayed. I mean, look at the buildings at the end of the street! Nothing in nature or in architecture looks like that! Part of it is perspective, but part of it is the unique set of distortions of my H50 zoom at full wide.

Of course, since such zoom distortion is so common today in images we see published, and since, without special perspective control lenses that only pros who specialize in architecture use, any image of buildings like this will show massive perspective distortion, we have begun to take such distortion for granted. It is part of the image. We are over it. It is not that we do not see it…it is that we make automatic, even unconscious, allowances for it.

And distortions like this hardly effect my landscapes and macros at all. They are there but it takes rectangular objects stacked and a close horizon like…well like buidings in Old Town Wetzlar along a narrow street…to bring them really to the forefront.

So, I have two choices. I can enjoy the tourist style shots of the Old City for what they are, distortion and all, or I can attempt to fix it in software.

Until this past week, fixing in software for me was not an attractive option. My little Acer Aspire One Netbook, while it handles general processing and cataloging in Lightroom just fine and has made me a happy mobile photographer for quite some time, simply chokes on a task as mathematically intensive as adjusting the perspective and distortion of an image…even using PhotoShop Element’s excellent Camera Distortion Filter. For me it is complicated by the fact that Lightroom is my primary tool. Lightroom lacks distortion filters, so I have to open the file in an external editor (Elements in my case), work on it, and save it back to my Lightroom catalog. Lightroom makes the process very easy, but having both Lightroom and Elements open on my netbook at the same time, and doing any complex task strains the resources of the computer to the max…past the max too often. Even if it works, a lot of time is spent waiting while the computer thinks about whether it is going to work. And the alternative, saving the Lightroom version to drive, closing Lightroom and opening Elements, opening the file, doing my thing there, saving the image back to drive, then reimporting it into my Lightroom catalog…well, since my processing time is limited by my real job, and I have a family that wants some of my attention, it would have to be a very special image for me to do all that!

Last week, though, I upgraded my travel laptop/netbook. You will undoubtedly hear more about it in a more comprehensive review at some later date, since it is already revolutionizing the way I deal with images (as in this case), but suffice it to say for now that I can now work with Lightroom and Elements at the same time, flipping back and forth as needed, and both programs are, by my standards (which are probably low compared to a pro), satisfyingly responsive even on the most complex tasks.

(Okay I won’t keep you in suspense. It is an Atom powered HP Mini 311 with Nvida ION graphis; an 11.6 inch, 1366×768 (16/9 ratio) screen; and 3 gigs of memory. My new travel/photography computer.)

Now that I have the equipment, I decided to attempt some distortion control on a few of my favorite Wetzlar shots.

This is the image above, processed with PhotoShop Elements Camera Lens Distortion filter set.

Perspective and Distortion controlled version

Distortion and Perspective controlled version

It is still not perfect. I might go back and rework it a bit more, but it is way better, at least from a distortion perspective (pun!) than the original. The buildings don’t lean crazily any more. The lines are more or less straight, and the walls apparently vertical. I accomplished this in about 2 minutes using the filter in Elements.

Whether it is a better image than the original is a matter of personal taste and photographic philosophy. I think I like it better. I think, right at the moment, that it was worth the effort of correction. I think, if I were to make a print to hang on the wall, I would prefer the corrected version. Of course, on mature reflection, that might all change. We shall see.

What do you think?

I am going, for anyone interested, to walk you through processing out the distortion in an image using the Correct Camera Distortion filter in PhotoShop Elements.

The first step, if you are working in Lightroom, is to have Lightroom make a copy with your Lightroom edits and send it to Elements. It is a two click process. If you are working directly in Elements, just open the image.

This is our starting image.

Where we start

The Correct Camera Distortion filter is in the Filters menu. The open dialog looks like this. Click the image here to see a full screen view.

Correct Camera Distortion filter dialog: Elements

As you can see, you have several distortion controls at your command, beginning with Distortion (which controls barrel and pincushion), down through vertical and horizontal perspective, vignetting and edge stretch. The best part though is the fine grid laid over the image and the fact that you can watch changes you make happen in real time. All you have to do is adjust the controls so that verticals match the upright grid lines and horizontals match the lines across, and then adjust edge stretch so the frame is filled once more.

I always start with perspective. In most shots it will be vertical perspective that is noticeably off. Experiment with the slider. As you can see in the screen shot, the slider stretches one edge (top or bottom) of the image and shrinks the other. Slide it until the verticals in the image more or less match the verticals in the grid.

Slide to adjust the verticals in the image.

Once the perspective is more or less correct, you can adjust distortion. Distortion turns straight lines into curves, and warps objects at the edge of the frame. Slide the slider until lines that should be straight are.

Slide the distortion control until straight lines are straight

After adjusting distortion you may find that the perspective no longer looks right. Go back and readjust if needed.

A second perspective adjustment may be necessary

Finally you can use the Edge Stretch control to stretch the image to fill the rectangular frame, effectively cropping off the curved edges of the corrected image: then apply the whole effect with a single click. Alternatively, you can leave the Edge Stretch tool alone, apply the filter, and then manually corp out the undistorted center of the image.

And that’s it.

And where we got to...

I should say that the peak of the building on the right is actually quite off kilter in reality.

Here is another example of an image that benefits, in my opinion, from some distortion control.

The tall thin problem

And the solution.

Upright!

So, fear not Distortion City, even if you are packing a P&S. Just plan to spend some quality time with PhotoShop Elements, or PhotoShop itself, and the Camera Distortion filter. It is amazingly easy.

→ 6 CommentsCategories: PhotoShop Elements · distortion · editing · instruction · perspective · postprocessing

Gingerbread Tourist: with Sanyo CG10 dual camera

October 31, 2009 · 1 Comment

Best Quality Cape May Gingerbread

I spent several days in Cape May NJ last week, and I was trying, over the phone, to explain the charm of the place to my wife. I said, “One of these days, on a nice sunny day, I will walk around the Victorian section and take some pictures to show you.”

Well, we didn’t get a nice sunny day when I was not trapped inside working, so one early evening I decided to just do it, despite glowering clouds and a threat of rain in the air.

Closer to the Gingerbread

In the spirit of the thing, I left my Sony H50 in the hotel room, and just took my little, fits-in-my-pocket, Sanyo CG10: a dual camera that does HD video and 10mp stills (which I have reviewed here in the past). Playing tourist, plain and simple.

Though the Sanyo does not have a true wide-angle lens, I set the camera to HD still format which produces a wide looking shot. It was a bit cramped in places, but it worked.

I also kept the camera on auto everything. This was not about photography as a craft.

Quick, spontaneous…see image, snap image. Don’t think, just see and snap and move on. After all, it was about to rain on me.

I covered about 1.5 miles of Cape May’s streets, and found some excellent examples of gingerbread, and a few quirky sings. I recorded the motel where I was staying, which features some interesting sudo-Victorian iron work, mostly so my family could know where I was. Pure tourist.

And I have to say it was fun. I accepted the limitations of the camera and worked with it…kind of setting my mind and eye to see what the camera could capture, without worrying about what it couldn’t. I refused to think about what I might have done if I’d had the more capable H50 with me. Not what this was about. Pure tourist.

Extreme Color

And, all in all, I am pretty happy with the results. In the spirit of the thing, my only processing in Lightroom was done with presets in batch mode. Auto White Balance. Punch. And Sharpen Landscapes. All applied without opening a single image in Develop mode.

No single image stands out, but the whole gallery is makes the impression I was after. Good exercise. Lots of fun. Pure tourist stuff, and what P&S is really made for.

You can see the whole gallery at Cape May Gingerbread.  Take a stroll with me through Victorian Cape May and enjoy the simple pleasures of being a tourist.

Though, come to think of it, maybe this image does stand out.

Ceramic Gingerbread

→ 1 CommentCategories: inspiration

No Such Thing as a Bad Photograhpy Day at Point Lobos

October 18, 2009 · 4 Comments

Off North Point and Cypress Grove

Off North Point and Cypress Grove

I visited Point Lobos the same weekend, two years in a row. The first time, a year ago, it was a clear morning. I got there just as the park opened, and stayed until early afternoon when the fog rolled in. This year, I was late, as I stopped on the way down to PhotoScope Sea-Otters and Curlews at Moss Landing.

http://weiw.lightshedder.com/Landscape-Wildlife/Monterey-Bay-09/9763798_iaHWP/1/#662908100_TLDUX-A-LB

North Point from Sealion Point trail.

North Point from Sealion Point trail.

I got to Point Lobos about 10:30, and the fog was already rolling across the headlands. But still, there is no such thing as a bad day for photography at Point Lobos. The light may be different. The mood changes with the weather. But the cliffs and coves, the headlands and inlets, the coastline and the trees, are always spectacular.

Hidden Beach: one of my new discoveries from this year

Hidden Beach: one of my new discoveries from this year

This year I walked some trails I had not walked last year, and discovered some new beaches and coves along the center section of the coastline. I was amazed. And I revisited all my favorite spots from last year, often taking very similar images…the vantage points along much of the coast are limited by the trails and wire trial guides…you can only stand where they let you stand unless you are the kind to break the rules and trample fragile vegitation. I am not. I stood where expected and took the expected shots…except that they were, of course, completely different than those I took a year ago.

Splender in the Weeds

Splender in the Weeds

The fog added mood and mystery to what had been sun-lit and bold last time. The horizon was closed off just beyond the points. Coves were walled in on the sea side. Colors were subtle and softer. It made the small details close by all the more interesting. It was great!

Down at Beach level in China Cove

Down at Beach level in China Cove

This year the stairway down to China Cove Beach was open again (last year the bottom half had been torn away by a storm). I love China Cove, and this was a whole new view.

China Cove from Above: stood here last year...this years image is different!

China Cove from Above: stood here last year...this year's image is different!

But then, as I say, I can’t imagine any weather, any day, that would not be a good day for photography along this amazing section of coast.

I could have taken these same shots with a full bag of DSLR gear, and they might have marginally better, but the ease of carrying the advanced P&S (Sony DCS H50) somehow keeps me more in the experience…more focused on the sights and sounds of the place…the physical sensations…that I might be while doing serious photography with a full DSLR kit. It allows me to do satisfying photography without being completely focused on photography. That is what I like about P&S.

Bluefish Cove from the trail above Whalers Cove

Bluefish Cove from the trail above Whaler's Cove

When the fog got really heavy shortly after noon, I packed up and headed out of the park. It seemed a shame not to see what Whaler’s Cove was like on my way past, and I discovered another whole world. The fog had not reached that far into bay yet and it was all bright sun there. Another mood…almost another world.

The Wall of China Cove

The Wall of China Cove

You can compare the images from this year with last year’s take at my Point Lobos gallery on Wide Eyed in Wonder. Many more from this year’s visit are near the center of the Monterey Bay 09 gallery (or you can get to the gallery by clicking any of the images above, and then clicking the larger image to go to the gallery behind it).

There is no such thing as a bad photo day at Point Lobos.

Another from China Bay Beach

Another from China Bay Beach

→ 4 CommentsCategories: aesthetics · inspiration

Emmon’s Preserve: Learning to Expose for Post!

August 15, 2009 · 2 Comments

Deep in the Green

Deep in the Green

Emmon’s Preserve, managed by the Kennebunk Land Trust, is one of my favorite places to photograph. It is also one of the most difficult. A river runs through it ;) under a solid canopy of maples and pines, and depending on the weather can be anything from a trickle down over rocks and through pools to a raging torrent. The light is very tricky. Lots of shadow, from open to deep, and shafts of full sun illumination random patches of vegetation, a rock here and there, and select passages in the stream…often a single curl of water around a stone. It is any exposure system’s worst nightmare. Then too, the light is green in the shadows which gives most white balance automation fits.

And it is beautiful with an almost mystical beauty.

So I go back again and again to try again and again to capture what I see and feel there…with never any more than limited success. The dynamic range, from bright foliage to deep shadows under banks…from sun on water to shade under ferns, is simply too great for any sensor to capture. It does not matter whether you are using auto exposure in your camera, or computing manual exposure using the zone system, there are simply limits to what can be done.

This shot comes from an area of the Preserve I only discovered on my last visit. I don’t know how I missed it all these years, but a side trail loops up over a small ridge and comes back down to the river above the rapids and pools I know so well. This section is quieter, but with its own beauty.

Emmon’s Preserve is a great place to learn about exposing for post.

When shooting in Emmon’s preserve, I continue to experiment with different degrees of Exposure Compensation in the camera. Too much and you get great highlights but shadows that are totally blocked up and black. Too little and you get highlights which are burnt out and pure white. And of course the light in there under the canopy is never the same twice. You have to develop a sense of what will work. And you have to keep trying.
With a camera like the Sony DSC H50 that has true live view, you can judge, or maybe learn to judge would be more accurate, the effects of your chosen Exposure Compensation…you can see pretty much what you are doing.
When shooting in Emmon’s preserve, I continue to experiment with different degrees of Exposure Compensation in the camera. Too much and you get great highlights but shadows that are totally blocked up and black. Too little and you get highlights which are burnt out and pure white. And of course the light in there under the canopy is never the same twice. You have to develop a sense of what will work. And you have to keep trying.
With a camera like the Sony DSC H50 that has true live view, you can judge, or maybe learn to judge would be more accurate, the effects of your chosen Exposure Compensation on the LCD…you can see pretty much what you are doing.
Still, the proof of the pudding doesn’t come until you try to process the image back on the computer. Even if you use the camera’s exposure compensation, or manually compute a compromise exposure, an image like this requires post-processing.

I use Lightroom, and it has both Recovery and Fill Light tools. Both are tone mapping tools, in that they change the relative exposure values (tones) for a selected range of tones, and only that range. Recovery selectively reduces the intensity of highlights within the image. It is a simple slider and you can watch its effect in real time as you move it. Fill Light is exactly the opposite. As you might expect from the name, it increases the exposure level of only the shadows. Again, it does it in real time, as you move a slider.

Tone mapping is a powerful tool, bull all tone mapping tools, and Fill Light in particular, require restraint. Over use leads to strange and easily recognized halo effects at sharp contrast boundaries, especially where land meets sky. When you see a little whitish line running along the tops of mountains in some HDR  images or outlining tree branches caught against the sky, it is the result of aggressive tone mapping (high dynamic range images are generally tone mapped to fit the expanded contrast scale from multiple exposures into the limited scale of the monitor or printing device).

In this image, heavy Recovery was needed to bring out any detail in the brighter areas back among the trees, and Fill Light was needed to open the shadows.

I have mentioned before that post-processing in situations like this is not used to save an incorrectly exposed image. In the field you expose the image knowing what you can and will do to it in Lightroom (or whatever software you use for post-processing). You expose it differently than you might if image editing software were not available. I used -.7 EV exposure compensation in the camera in the field to tame the highlights back among the trees.  -.7EV is not enough to bring out all the detail in the highlights, and yet already it makes the shadows too dark, obscuring detail there. -.7EV is, however, the correct place to begin expanding the dynamic range with the tools available in Lightroom. All but the brightest highlights can be brought back in range by Recovery, and the Fill Light tool does a good job of selectively opening the shadows. You have to know this when making the exposure in the field. In a sense you expose for post, knowing that image as it comes from the camera will be unsatisfactory, but also knowing what you can do in post-proecessing.

This is exactly the method film photographers developed to deal with the limited dynamic range of their materials. Ansel Adams was perhaps it’s most noted practitioner. He called it the Zone System. He exposed the negative to make the best print, even though it might look like an underexposed or overexposed negative to a conventional film photographer. There was definitely a method to his exposure madness.

With today’s tools, you don’t have to know the Zone system: especially with Lightroom’s interactive tool set. With Lightroom, as noted above, you can see what you are doing. Changes are real time as you move the control. You see how much the highlights are brought back with the Recovery tool. You can see how much the shadows are opened with the Fill Light tool…and, just as importantly, you can see what the tools are doing to the rest of the image.

Both Recovery and Fill light flatten the contrast curve at the ends. They remap the tones at either extreme down into the range where the monitor or print medium can handle them. Overall you lose contrast, but if done carefully, it gives the appearance of expanded dynamic range. As in the image above.

Here is another example:

Run and Fall

Run and Fall

I used the same -.7EV Exposure Compensation as a starting point. As you see maximum Recovery in Lightroom still left the highlights in the water too hot…not noticeable perhaps, but there to my eye. And I was not able to pull the shadows under the bank out without losing the dappled sun effect on the mossy rocks. Still, it is about as good as can be done with a single jpeg exposure.

After lots of experience in Emmon’s  Preserve it is becoming easier for me than it sounds, since I have learned that, with proper EV adjustment, the Programed auto on the H50 produces an excellent, well balanced, beginning exposure. If I ever switch cameras (realistically when I switch cameras) I am going to have to learn to do this all over again.

And Emmon’s Preserve will be there, always willing to teach me.

→ 2 CommentsCategories: Lightroom · editing · inspiration · instruction · postprocessing